Films Feature

This film was brilliant, as always Bruce Willis was in his best form and the story had continuety larger with time elapsed since the last Die Hard movie for quite some time to get to see where he is now family and wise, I was a total action packed adventure that I thoroughly enjoyed with some wicked scenes of destruction with a very good story line too. Thanks Bruce for this, another in truth, the movie Die Hard.

ps. Listening to his famous catch phrase Die Hard, is put right at the perfect moment that we (my family and I) all voices, YES and laughed when he said it.

A U.S. Navy strike hard romp in the civil war-torn Nigeria to repatriate U.S. civilian physician and hangers on. U.S. 9 stamps Navy led by Bruce Willis.

Do not be intimidated by the first 20 minutes or so, it gets better. The horror of the scenes of ethnic cleansing in the town are excellent - scenes reminiscent of Schindler’s List. Bruce and the boys become hardened soldiers with a heart.

Shame on the U.S. medical atypical woman who wants to leave and eventually fell for Bruce - predictable. The excellent music and photography. Some blood and guts, but nothing too gratutitous.

She liked it.

Nice to see Bruce back to doing what he does best. A really exciting thriller with great performances from everyone.

The plot is quite original and are just bright enough money to stop you from guessing what will happen. The movie is choc full of tension and edge-of-your-seat moments until the end credits. This film is what Mr. Willis stands out, and I can not wait to see more of them.

The music was Spot-On and really creates a great atmosphere for the film, especially the scene excellent introduction to the awesome theme song. It really put me in the mood. I would say that the persons concerned, the movie should have been a 18 but can only get away with it about being a 15.

Although it may be a bit violent at times, do not let you down, never goes too far and although I avoid violent movies, I loved it.

I liked this movie. Maybe it was the fact that I had not been to the cinema for so long. Maybe it was the fact that Bruce Willis has not made a really decent film since Unbreakable.

Maybe it was just the fact that for pure popcorn pleasure, hostage-taking has all the ingredients for a night of entertainment in.A Cross between Die Hard and the panic room, Bruce Willis is a bit more respectful in their approach to this drama, action movies are. Okay, so I see wearing his dirty white vest again, but also sees him struggling with his inner (more dramatic, baby) I. He is an actor right now know.It ’s all been done before, but the film rattles along at a thrilling pace and the cast are all in good shape.

You have to feel sorry though for the daughter of our chief hostage.As good as it is, most of the men’s attention will focus on its more obvious charms and is part of the reason it works so well.Funbags Hostage funbags or not, hostages still delivers on many levels. It’s not perfect, of course, but still perfectly entertaining.

I agree with others here. After seeing the first two episodes only had to stop.

Not only the quality horrible (which is largely directed at you Bruce Willis), the story and the scripts were terrible. This is more like a half-baked Eerie Indiana to what I expected. The second episode is very similar to children’s television program ‘Look Bernards “in which the main character can stop time.

But the first episode is well and truly takes the prize. Bruce Willis, obviously had this before finding a Yellow Pages and search for acting classes.

In my honest opinion would not bother renting this if I were you.

I loved the movie. Lets face it, the script was just going to be a classic, considering that the plot of the three previous films was a little ridiculous. This latest sequel is no exception, although I was doing quite well in the face of credibility until the fighter appeared!

He liked the idea that the script has been directed toward the idea of modern technology is used as a weapon against them. Wisecraks usual and explosions and a great villain (he was good looking girls) and a fellow of great villain (which was good to look at the guys).

Both the film did not hurt anyone!

Well, well - yes, this film is visually stunning! And if this movie is original and interesting conceptually, but you know what?

SO WHAT? It takes more than that to make a decent movie. And no, the fingers are liberals who criticize the movie for being too violent and misogynist who do not learn anything.

A / This is not black cinema, but is in a hyper-noir universe, black cinema that does not involve super-human machines of killing an endless parade of scenes featuring little more than super stylish wholesale slaughter. Cinema black is mystery, confusion, moral ambiguity and the dark side of real people, not two-dimensional comic characters.

B / It said the film is based largely on the pulp fiction of the ’40s and ’50s, “although it does in the beginning of a strong process of transformation and distortion (there is nothing in Chandler, as someone suggested), but as fiction might be misogynist, but NO that is not a justification. If you were making a film that was based on the Victorian adventure stories based on the British Empire would be acceptable to degenerate Indians have been portrayed as savages?

Copper and no, it would be so massive offensive massivley this film is offensive. This movie is little more than a hard commitment of masturbation, fantasies of a man’s inner child, a boy who apparently shares much with a lot of other mens kids inside. And this is what I found for about disppointing the film - which could have been much better.

The cast is great if they get little space to display it. The concept and visual effects that are set for what you believed to be a sensual feast of a movie.

And some of the characters are not far from the record for most noir ISH, mainly Hardigan EST Willis. But there is little real story to speak of, the script was only half finished, and some of the characters were just silly. Mickey Rourke’s Marv Take, for example, you know what a movie can not be exciting, you can not convey a sense of suspense and danger, when the main character is presented as virtually indestructible.

Give the man limits, we do the work within them, which will add the drama and risk. Ultimatley its too much of a tribute, too much of a caricature, and much of a hoax and boring. And violence is not only excessive, its ridiculous.

Yes, it’s a cartoon, but people are being infantilis for films like this, fantasize about being like these characters. Violence is not only well - why do we have a fetish is?

So should not feel guilty that we got to see someone tortured to death? In whose book is entertaining, and have had a recent psychiatric evaluation?

Well, that was a bit of a rave, but the question remains: visuals are not enough. Look at Key Largo, by God, now that the film has drama, suspense, risk, and no special effects.

Sin City is - in my opinion - a great film. I loved the look of Film Noir, because it is a technique rarely used any more.

Although often grates nerves CGI when it is so obviously false, but in Sin City is used to good effect … not trying to be real, and it also provides the comic-feel the love!

Violence is cool. Most of it is on the top and almost kitsch in a way … but this is played with good results with black humor - that’s always fun in a movie cynical …

The narrative structure is fast and makes a film Sin City with a strong plot, not to be confused with meaningless violence filled action. It takes some serious concentration … But I thought it was a great movie, and it’s good to see the principals remain true to the original material.

My favorite scene is undoubtedly directed by Quentin Tarantino Jackie-Boy/Dwight scene when Dwight is driving to the pits …

For me, this was a very antisipated film, I thought it might warrant a 5 star rating, which is rare for me, but the film was not what I expected. Do not get me wrong the film is good with a good cast with a hard man Bruce retired negiotator struggle with a difficult personal dilemma. It has some cool, effects, and the film has the money that had been waiting trailers.

I think what disappointed me was the people and act in the people celebrating the rich family of rescue. But ever fewer people should see this movie.